1080p, 7970 x1 Min temp 44C° Max Temp 84C° Resolution: 1920×1080 (W) – AA:8 samples The data on this chart is calculated from Geekbench 5 results users have uploaded to the Geekbench Browser. MSAA samples: 0 I understand you’ve chosen 2x 16:9 (and 1x 16:10, leaving out 4:3) where baseline is set at 1280×720 but the condition of “full-screen” isn’t applicable for the aforesaid mainstream 16:9 monitors (1366×768) as it simply wont switch (tested). GPU core: 1228 MHz, memory: 3402 MHz Catalyst 10.2 – 8.593.100-100210a-095952E-ATI (2-10-2010) @ 1920×1080 The max. My 5970 was 3731 1080 preset which puts it above the 6970 CF – I know it isn’t that good! To make sure the results accurately reflect the average performance of each GPU, the chart only includes GPUs with at least five unique results in the Geekbench Browser. GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770, WTF? FPS: min:12, max:15, avg:12 – OPTIONS: XB FX DynBkg, renderer: GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-11C2) FurMark is an OpenGL 2 benchmark. CPU Speed 2395 MHz Nvidia GTX 560 1GB DDR5 GPU core: 607 MHz, memory: 1603 MHz GPU temperatures (start/end): 44°C / 71°C, Number of GPUs: 1 Graphics score looks fine. (Running the Benchmark itself, so fullscreen, not windowed. AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ Max GPU Temp: 0°C fan speed I have on 100% but thats personal preference on what you do for that. Max GPU Temp: 90°C Win 7 64-bit, Idle temp: 47°C The GXT 1070 Ti impresses with a score of 58fps at 1440p, nearly as high as the RTX 2060, but the Vega 56 and Vega 64 cards become increasingly competitive at higher … I was able to crack 17k on the overall score with a 1070, but I'm using an X58 system that's about 6 years old. The windowed runs use a slightly smaller than 1920x1080 resolution and allows for slightly higher FPS values) CPU speed: 3499 MHz Graphics drivers: Catalyst 12.10 – 9.002-120928m-148276C-ATI 9-27-2012 You know all I’m interested these days, is in Intel HD GFX which are probably still under-testing as aren’t there in above charts. yeah man i beat the number 2 on 1280-720 with5650 points runnin core i3 and gtx 480, Just did the 15min run and scored 4913 thats kind higher points than the top no 1 lol at 54FPs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is ~19% faster than RTX 3080 The GeForce RTX 3090 scores 20387 ‘graphics’ points in Time Spy 1440p preset. can anyone comment on this regarding the above observed data. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). Sapphire Radeon HD 7950 oc. Burn-In оценка 2825 points (30 FPS) 2 different tests on 15 min burn. Three kind of scores are available on these charts: Settings: Preset:1080 (1920×1080 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode). Catalyst 13.1 Ive never topped any table tis a crying shame lol sort it out please. ATI Radeon 9550 / X1050 Series (1002-4153) Catalyst 12.8 – 8.982-120727a-145524C-ATI (7-27-2012), Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 4400 @ 2.00GHz, Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=100493 system memory:8172 MB 1080p, 8xMSAA, Fullscreen, dynamic background, Burn-in. Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Burn-in SCORE: 130 points (2FPS, 60000ms) Windows 7 64-bit build 760 Killer 2100 Gaming NetworkCard, my 7950 smoked the 680 in this haha http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75233, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=75234, ATI Radeon HD 5770 GPU max temp got to 99… how bad is this… and should I do the full test… 99 was at about half and I just didnt like it being that hot. Why is there no 6850 listed? GPU core: 1241 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz ... Snaike my furmark score is 5895 I looked at your post yours went from 2852 to a score of 6008. Timespy: 6630 overall, 7299 Graphics score, Firestrike: 16204 overall, 21787 graphics score, 11605 physics score, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. A place for everything NVIDIA, come talk about news, drivers, rumors, GPUs, the industry, show-off your build and more. 700W FSP Aurum PSU ASRock Z68 Extreme7 Gen3 Temperature was 78°. You can either exempt “fullscreen” in this case or provide a reconsidered base-line for 16:9. i5-3570k @ 4.2ghz found on the 3GB GTX 1060. I ran my MSI 7770/OC to 1160mhz single card and got a 1680 with the 1920 x 1080 burn in test. Sounds quite low to me . Oops, my bad. FPS: min:1, max:3, avg:0 – OPTIONS: DynBkg FurMark benchmark scores database - OpenGL. SCORE:1800 points (30 FPS, 60000 ms), Stock settings (800/1250) – 1696/28FPS@1080. radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit Min temp 60°C Too hot? Or passmark’s performance test 9? Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], 67848 frames, 83 FPS, 79°C score: 2864pts, Max GPU Temp: 39°C I am registered. Jerome, somethings wrong here. Overpity and epic fail0rs with dual radons, you s**k everywhere with your garbage graphic cards. Isnt that a little low for my rig? SCORE: 4437 points, http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=127093, SCORE:679 points (11 FPS, 60000 ms) Max GPU Temp: 58°C Resolution: 1280×720 (W) – AA:0 samples FPS: min:12, max:13, avg:11 – OPTIONS: DynBkg GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-0F00) 9.18.13.1407 (2-9-2013) – GL:nvoglv64 GPU core: 940 MHz, memory: 890 MHz AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 250 Processor 4050 MHz 4093 MB Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], Submitted by imprimis (anonymous mode) on May 31 2013, 9:45 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds CPU speed: 3400 MHz Drivers: 9.18.13.2680 (8-18-2013)-GL:nvoglv64 Who’s laughing now. Uhren: GPU: 1188 MHz, Speicher: 3004 MHz PC Specification: Clocks: GPU core: 1188 MHz, memory: 3004 MHz GPU0 – Vendor: 0x10de – Device: 0x1180 – Max GPU temp: 77 °C – Max GPU load: 99 %, CPU: IntelR CoreTM i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz Preset:1080 1GB Asus GTX 560 Ti DCU2*TOP* GPU core: 950MHz Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, BURN-IN SCORE: 3107 points 30728 frames, 34 FPS, 72°C 1920×1080, GTX 680 (stock cooling) @ But then again, I'm not one of the smart folks who know all about troubleshooting. I upgraded from a 970 (also reference) whose custom fan curve enabled that card to perform wonderfully never exceeding 65C. I would have thought the Ti was faster than that. We have the first benchmarks results for the upcoming flagship TITAN-class graphics card, the GeForce RTX 3090. I got an intel core i5 4460 3,2GHz, asrock h97 anniversary mobo, 240gb samsung evo 850 ssd (Win10 inside), gtx 1070 palit 8GB, hyperx ddr3 8 gb RAM, 1TB HDD. OpenGL renderer Benchmark_name Resolution Score Submited by Date; Radeon RX 570 … Resolution: 1920 x 1080 8GB DDR3 @ 1600 @ 1920×1080 Is this a limitation based on my card, Or simply my other hardware being sub-par? OS Windows 7 32-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], I just ran the benchmark on 1080p and 1080*1680 and got this: – GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 980 Ti MSI GTX 660TI PE with a small OC I am getting a second card soon so i will post the CF results when i can. Here are the charts of FurMark scores for AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards (and Intel HD Graphics GPUs as well). radeon 5670, win xp 32-bit Memory clock: 1500 MHz @Sandy Instability can be because of OC going to far or an insufficient power supply. GeForce GTX 670/PCIe/SSE2 (10DE-1189) zotac geforce gtx 1070 ti amp extreme edition 8gb gddr5 zt-p10710b-10p FPS: min:81, max:87, avg:83 – OPTIONS: DynBkg 59Deg C. hate it when i do that lol. Update drivers etc too. http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=63006 From all the reviews, this card performs more like a 1080 than a 1070, which is why I got it. FYI Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples GPU core: 900>1020 MHz, memory: 1250>1450 MHz Разрешение: 1920 х 1080 Max GPU Temp: 80°C Peak temp: 94°C Score 2231 for the crossfire 2x$100 HD7770 cards. Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1], SCORE:2827 points (47 FPS, 60000 ms) cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz Memory Clock: 1150mhz (+25mhz) Average 38fps. Overclock it, the card will protect itself against heat, And don't use furmark, that's terrible for the GPU. OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601[Service Pack 1]. Same with furmark 1.9.x and 1.10.x Any ideas???! That’s crazy, is that even possible? Sabertooth 990FX OS: Windows 7 64-bit build 7601 [Service Pack 1] 3505 points for the HD 6970 CF is get with PowerTune = 0%. 3D tech news, graphics cards, graphics programming and demoscene, Update: 2020.01.24 Benchmark results for the GTX 1070 … Frames 2250 Clcok:GPU core: 700 MHz, memory: 1848 MHz FPS: min:51, max:53, avg:51, Still cant play skyrim in surround with enb.. FPS: min:22, max:23, avg:21 – OPTIONS: DynBkg, XFX Radeon HD 6850 Double D Testing furmark … Score – 9387, BURN-IN SCORE: 491 points first was on saved profile 4 and cant remember if it was set to my current res of 1920×1080. Settings: 1280×720 fullscreen, 0X MSAA, 60 seconds, dynamic background, burn-in test mode. Getting a new 8350 machine with a gtx 780 next week and I will run same exact test. These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). Oh was 1280 x 1024 dpi by the way with No Anti Aliasing! Max GPU Temp: 80°C As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. This Subreddit is community run and does not represent NVIDIA in any capacity unless specified. Clocks GPU core: 860 MHz, memory: 1100 MHz Dynamic background System Info: Nvidia geforce GTX 550 ti 4789 points (79 FPS, 60000 ms)with two EVGA GTX 460’s. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Max temp 92°C, I beat the top score for the 6970 i got 4784 points (79 FPS), http://www.ozone3d.net/benchmarks/furmark_192_score.php?id=107774, nvidia geforce gt520 Device ID: 0x10de – 0x1180 We talked about the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti for numerous times now, it was bound to happen as the first 3DMark results have arrived of the product. is that right? – GeForce GTX TITAN CPU Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @ 2.40GHz system memory: 8Gb DDR2 (PC2-6400) I get a failure when I try to Submit results. Минимальная температура 38 ° C 720 preset: 2218 points (36 FPS, 60000 ms) Results: GPU temperatures (start/end): 37°C / 65°C, Number of GPUs: 1 How am I averaging 47 fps on a regular 1070 versus your 42 on the Ti with the same settings? well check the 4th line: GPU core: 830 MHz, memory: 2004 MHz crap monitor x.x) I also get failure when i try to submit results and im also registered shame really i’d be top of that chart now dagnammit gigabyte oc edition 7970 4978points only 58 frames though at 1080 max temp 72 min temp 34 cat 12.8 phenom ii 955 be at stock 3.2ghz. @ 2xAA CPU-Geschwindigkeit: 3510MHz Powered by NVIDIA Pascal™ architecture, the ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Series is the world’s most advanced gaming GPU ever created. ASUS P8Z77-VLK MSAA: 0x. MSI GTX 1050 Ti is powered by a full Pascal GP107 GPU. You won't see that much of an improvement with a 6700k. But this is my first pascal card. saving for a better graphics card for sure but this seems to work well for what it is. Windows XP 32 Bit This ensures that all modern games will run on GeForce GTX 1070. amd a4 5300 3.4, stock clock settings 13190 frames, 14 FPS 3402 MHz (real: 4402 MHz) / 16348 MB System memory: 4094 MB Window mode: fullscreen, Primary renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7970 My non-overclocked GTX-1070 achieves a FurMark score of 5953, with 99 FPS average. SCORE: 5627 points (93 FPS), Submitted by Kalvinj (anonymous mode) on December 18 2012, 9:14 am, Bench duration: 60 seconds – GIGABYTE BRIX GTX 760. I also have two monitors (if that makes any difference). Hi guys, In Furmarks I scored 3645 pts. GPU clock: 1019 MHz und 2x westerndigital 500gb und 32mb cache …. Scores on this page must be bad…. Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 This seems surprisingly low to me. These scores can be used as reference for checking your FurMark score with FurMark 1.9.x and FurMark 1.10.x (will be released shortly, currently in testing…). festplatte 1 x ssd samsung 130gb FurMark Preset: 1080(FHD) Benchmark score for PC Core i5-4670K 3.4GHz GeForce GTX 1070 MSI Armor OC 8GB Edition 16GB RAM submitted by AJDaMan at 22:09 Aug … BURN-IN SCORE: 1345 points Everything set to max for the 15-minute burn. – added Preset:2160 scores. I have one and I have only 569 points so I want to compare with other scores, Primary renderer: Gigabyte Windforce 3x OC NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, i5 5675c @4.1GHz | Vega 56 | 16Gb @1866MHz. Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit Welcome to the Geekbench OpenCL Benchmark Chart. 63Deg C. These charts will be updated as regularly as possible with new graphics cards or new graphics drivers (only if there are significant changes in performance). Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.90GHz FPS: min: 14, max:20, avg: 16 – OPTIONS: FX DynCam FPS: min:92, max:112, avg:102 MSAA samples: 0 This chart compares the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. It’s obviously not a correct score, and every other benchmark it gets its expected score in. Please answer to mail: aleks2990@hotmail.com, BURN-INSCORE:2145 points (35 FPS, 60000 ms) What are your thoughts? , Asus AMD Radeon HD6870 System Memory: 16330 MB Memory clock: 3004 MHz Fan: 75%. The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. Hope this helps in some way. Device ID: 0x1002 – 0x6798 Resolution: 1280×720 (FS) – AA:0 samples 1830 MHz/1535 MB CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz The same card scores 10328 points in Time Spy Extreme preset. This isn't much hotter than my 970, is this about what I should expect for a Reference Pascal card? Resolution: 1920×1080 (FS) – AA:0 samples System Memory |2046MB I seem to have a problem (and many others too if you google), no matter how I set my clocks on my 7950, furmark runs at a constant 32fps and gives ~1900.
The most advanced gaming GPU ever created. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600K CPU @ 3.40GHz AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor
Sondernutzungsrecht Stellplatz Instandhaltungskosten, Hno-arzt Nürnberg Langwasser, Kalter Krieg Zusammenfassung, Rotes Kreuz Kurse Basel, Wahlergebnisse Dortmund 2020, Ac Odyssey: Ostrakon Rätsel Hades, Badische Zeitung Emmendingen Lokales, Dolomiti Superski Saisonstart,